Total Commodity Programs in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 724
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Plymouth County, Massachusetts totaled $15,184,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Anderson Brothers Farm | West Bridgewater, MA 02379 | $86,994 |
| 42 | Richard G Burnet | Plympton, MA 02367 | $85,328 |
| 43 | R M Lawton Cranberries Inc | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $80,573 |
| 44 | Piney Wood Cranberry Co | West Wareham, MA 02576 | $79,797 |
| 45 | D And D Harju Cranberries LLC | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $78,779 |
| 46 | Betty's Neck Farm Inc | Carver, MA 02330 | $77,878 |
| 47 | Quaker Run Cranberries LLC | Osterville, MA 02655 | $77,818 |
| 48 | Crystal Lake Greenhouse Inc | Carver, MA 02330 | $77,382 |
| 49 | White Dog Ltd | Halifax, MA 02338 | $74,425 |
| 50 | J A Jenkins And Son Cranberry LLC | Marstons Mills, MA 02648 | $74,206 |
| 51 | Clinton Howard Jr | West Bridgewater, MA 02379 | $71,657 |
| 52 | Indian Brook Cran Bog Inc | Manomet, MA 02345 | $71,602 |
| 53 | Old Tuck Cranberry Corp | West Wareham, MA 02576 | $70,129 |
| 54 | Harju Limited Partnership | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $69,271 |
| 55 | E J Pontiff Cranberries Inc. | Duxbury, MA 02332 | $62,447 |
| 56 | Ronald G Simons | Greenbush, MA 02040 | $62,105 |
| 57 | Chad Mahoney | Hull, MA 02045 | $61,997 |
| 58 | Edward M Koplovsky | Duxbury, MA 02332 | $60,790 |
| 59 | Rounsville, Hammond & Rounsville, | East Wareham, MA 02538 | $59,675 |
| 60 | Double M Cranberry Co Inc | Rochester, MA 02770 | $59,591 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf