Farm Subsidy information
Worcester County, Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 74
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $1,155,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert And Martha Richardson | Warren, MA 01083 | $9,129 |
22 | Walnut Lane LLC | Dudley, MA 01571 | $8,313 |
23 | David G Hanson | North Brookfield, MA 01535 | $7,736 |
24 | James A Wojcik | Blackstone, MA 01504 | $6,823 |
25 | William Rogers | Brimfield, MA 01010 | $6,418 |
26 | , | $6,210 | |
27 | Whittier Farms Inc | Sutton, MA 01590 | $6,089 |
28 | The Red Apple Farm LLC | Phillipston, MA 01331 | $5,498 |
29 | Joan R Walker | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $5,458 |
30 | Karl Heins | Westminster, MA 01473 | $4,800 |
31 | Elmhurst Dairy Farms LLC | Millbury, MA 01527 | $4,579 |
32 | Marianne E Mccarthy | Charlton, MA 01507 | $4,112 |
33 | Elias Richardson Iv | Uxbridge, MA 01569 | $2,882 |
34 | Imbier Monson Farm Partnership | Oakham, MA 01068 | $2,619 |
35 | Janet Mary Edwards | North Brookfield, MA 01535 | $2,520 |
36 | Stephen W Szerlag | Northbridge, MA 01534 | $2,422 |
37 | Stanley Grigas | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $2,385 |
38 | Richard Wright | Ashburnham, MA 01430 | $1,980 |
39 | John M Kittredge Many Hands Organic Farm | Barre, MA 01005 | $1,937 |
40 | Douglas A Waugh | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $1,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”