Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 73
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $179,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Karl Heins | Westminster, MA 01473 | $673 |
42 | Dismas Family Farm | Oakham, MA 01068 | $638 |
43 | Josephine Ndimugwanko | Providence, RI 02907 | $631 |
44 | Nalee Yang | Fitchburg, MA 01420 | $616 |
45 | Andrew Kimwomi | S Lancaster, MA 01561 | $568 |
46 | John M Winsky | Oxford, MA 01540 | $548 |
47 | Rael Onyiego | Clinton, MA 01510 | $522 |
48 | Nashaway Farms LLC | Lancaster, MA 01523 | $506 |
49 | Elmhurst Dairy Farms LLC | Millbury, MA 01527 | $500 |
50 | The Red Apple Farm LLC | Phillipston, MA 01331 | $489 |
51 | David W Shepard | Warren, MA 01083 | $489 |
52 | Peter W Hawkes | Mendon, MA 01756 | $485 |
53 | William Viveiros | North Dartmouth, MA 02747 | $422 |
54 | Fred Lake | Fitchburg, MA 01420 | $417 |
55 | Vincent Magasi | Leominster, MA 01453 | $394 |
56 | David Pease | Templeton, MA 01468 | $319 |
57 | Larry Favreau | Sterling, MA 01564 | $260 |
58 | Andrea Schnepf | Lunenburg, MA 01462 | $249 |
59 | Thistle Rock Farm LLC | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $239 |
60 | Elias Richardson Iv | Uxbridge, MA 01569 | $232 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”