Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 65
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $79,427 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lynn Hartman | Barre, MA 01005 | $114 |
42 | Fabiola Nizigiyimana | Worcester, MA 01604 | $109 |
43 | Hannah Miller | Sterling, MA 01564 | $104 |
44 | Veronicah Josephine Nyaigoti | Clinton, MA 01510 | $104 |
45 | Sangiwa Eliamani | Fitchburg, MA 01420 | $97 |
46 | Nalee Yang | Fitchburg, MA 01420 | $92 |
47 | Andrew Kimwomi | S Lancaster, MA 01561 | $85 |
48 | Patricia Tinker | Gilbertville, MA 01031 | $76 |
49 | Valeria Niyonkuru | Worcester, MA 01609 | $70 |
50 | Elizabeth Hunt | Winchendon, MA 01475 | $64 |
51 | Carl Rossbach | Fitchburg, MA 01420 | $62 |
52 | Vue Yang | Fitchburg, MA 01420 | $56 |
53 | Barnabas Forndia | Worcester, MA 01607 | $53 |
54 | Susan Roberts | Berlin, MA 01503 | $44 |
55 | , | $32 | |
56 | Christof Chartier | Templeton, MA 01468 | $31 |
57 | Richard Mecha | Leominster, MA 01453 | $27 |
58 | Marie Romaje | Leominster, MA 01453 | $25 |
59 | Alta Vista Farm | Rutland, MA 01543 | $25 |
60 | Sara A. Cadden | Westminster, MA 01473 | $25 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”