Direct Payment Program in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 176
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $829,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Imbier Monson Farm Partnership | Oakham, MA 01068 | $3,919 |
62 | Luther C Flanders Jr | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $3,904 |
63 | Richard Dewolf | Dudley, MA 01571 | $3,725 |
64 | Dresser Hill Farm | Dudley, MA 01571 | $3,672 |
65 | Wrights Dairy Farm Inc | North Smithfield, RI 02896 | $3,403 |
66 | Richard C Pelletier | Charlton, MA 01507 | $3,365 |
67 | David Cutrumbes | North Brookfield, MA 01535 | $3,352 |
68 | Tufts Un Sc Vet Med | North Grafton, MA 01536 | $3,309 |
69 | Clover Hill Farm | Uxbridge, MA 01569 | $3,285 |
70 | David Perkins | Petersham, MA 01366 | $3,085 |
71 | Elmhurst Dairy Farms | Millbury, MA 01527 | $3,059 |
72 | Adrienne Fitzpatrick | Dudley, MA 01571 | $2,972 |
73 | Norman Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $2,840 |
74 | Carter And Stevens Farm LLC | Barre, MA 01005 | $2,758 |
75 | John Brosnahan | Douglas, MA 01516 | $2,728 |
76 | Pleasantview Farm | Dudley, MA 01571 | $2,698 |
77 | Patricia Knowlton | Grafton, MA 01519 | $2,666 |
78 | Arthur D Keown Jr | Wilkinsonville, MA 01590 | $2,658 |
79 | Eric Starbard | Sterling, MA 01564 | $2,654 |
80 | Davis Dairy Inc | Sterling, MA 01564 | $2,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”