Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 113
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $52,780 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert Orne | North Brookfield, MA 01535 | $169 |
82 | Julie A Viveiros | North Dartmouth, MA 02747 | $156 |
83 | Gordon Macphee | Holden, MA 01520 | $151 |
84 | Hubbard's Farm LLC | Princeton, MA 01541 | $147 |
85 | Howard Ballou | Douglas, MA 01516 | $130 |
86 | David W Shepard | Warren, MA 01083 | $127 |
87 | Norma Bedrosian | Sutton, MA 01590 | $123 |
88 | Eben Chesebrough | East Douglas, MA 01516 | $115 |
89 | Paul Anderson | Gardner, MA 01440 | $110 |
90 | Victor P Kallgren | Dudley, MA 01571 | $107 |
91 | Raymond G Robinson Jr | Hardwick, MA 01037 | $106 |
92 | Steven M Bonavita | Millbury, MA 01527 | $102 |
93 | Sharon Kent | Sutton, MA 01590 | $92 |
94 | Scott F Hebert | Holden, MA 01520 | $91 |
95 | Cathleen Cervi | Spencer, MA 01562 | $89 |
96 | , | $89 | |
97 | Christof Chartier | Templeton, MA 01468 | $86 |
98 | Kent Van Hoven | Holden, MA 01520 | $84 |
99 | Robert Meagher | Hubbardston, MA 01452 | $80 |
100 | Shirley Mosczynski | Douglas, MA 01516 | $80 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”