Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 165
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $1,026,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Joseph P Duhamel | Barre, MA 01005 | $1,162 |
102 | James E Mendala | North Brookfield, MA 01535 | $1,143 |
103 | Glenn Kauppila | Rutland, MA 01543 | $1,107 |
104 | Gerald Roy | Sutton, MA 01590 | $1,100 |
105 | Mark Stevenson | Sutton, MA 01590 | $1,087 |
106 | Harpers Farm And Garden LLC | Lancaster, MA 01523 | $1,047 |
107 | The Red Apple Farm LLC | Phillipston, MA 01331 | $1,044 |
108 | Douglas A Waugh | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $940 |
109 | Janet Mary Edwards | North Brookfield, MA 01535 | $921 |
110 | Stillman Dairy Farm | Lunenburg, MA 01462 | $919 |
111 | Fredrick Wheeler Jr Dba Balance Rock Farm | Berlin, MA 01503 | $886 |
112 | Lukas Bjorklund | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $873 |
113 | Jonathan Dupuis | Lunenburg, MA 01462 | $804 |
114 | Somerset Farm | Jefferson, MA 01522 | $804 |
115 | Sara A. Cadden | Westminster, MA 01473 | $756 |
116 | John Sinkewicz | Barre, MA 01005 | $747 |
117 | Mustafa Harrati | Millville, MA 01529 | $705 |
118 | Nancy A Andrews | Spencer, MA 01562 | $648 |
119 | Robert Orne | North Brookfield, MA 01535 | $610 |
120 | Ben Carreno | Henefer, UT 84033 | $596 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”