Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 169
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $525,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Pollard Herbert And Nancy | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $867 |
102 | Herbert A Nelson | Sterling, MA 01564 | $849 |
103 | Roland Morin | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $807 |
104 | Christine Rota | Sterling, MA 01564 | $786 |
105 | Benjamin Kulisa | Dudley, MA 01571 | $775 |
106 | David Letendre | Brookfield, MA 01506 | $765 |
107 | Bennie Grigas | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $764 |
108 | Stanley D T White | Hardwick, MA 01037 | $724 |
109 | William Stelmokas | Barre, MA 01005 | $682 |
110 | David E Howe | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $669 |
111 | Rhonda L Dziembowski | Dudley, MA 01571 | $605 |
112 | Sharon Kent | Sutton, MA 01590 | $582 |
113 | Roger Thomas | Spencer, MA 01562 | $567 |
114 | Victor P Kallgren | Dudley, MA 01571 | $548 |
115 | Joseph W Robinson | Hardwick, MA 01037 | $547 |
116 | Kathleen Trum-searah | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $536 |
117 | Ann E Starbard | Sterling, MA 01564 | $536 |
118 | Donald V Dolan | Rutland, MA 01543 | $515 |
119 | Stuart Morrow | Paxton, MA 01612 | $468 |
120 | Sylvia Post | Auburn, MA 01501 | $467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”