Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 165
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $1,026,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Breezelands Orchards Inc | Warren, MA 01083 | $550 |
122 | Ellenbecker Family Land Limited Partnership | Olathe, KS 66061 | $547 |
123 | Norma Bedrosian | Sutton, MA 01590 | $545 |
124 | Gail R Johnson | Rutland, MA 01543 | $534 |
125 | John Gomersall | Mendon, MA 01756 | $510 |
126 | Bruce Hopper | Auburn, MA 01501 | $500 |
127 | Cathleen Cervi | Spencer, MA 01562 | $497 |
128 | Cynda Joyce | Ashburnham, MA 01430 | $489 |
129 | Jody Jess | Westminster, MA 01473 | $489 |
130 | Michael E Janowicz | Royalston, MA 01368 | $488 |
131 | Christine Humphrey | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $470 |
132 | Andrea Schnepf | Lunenburg, MA 01462 | $459 |
133 | Carl Rossbach | Fitchburg, MA 01420 | $458 |
134 | E Kevin Kraszeski | Berlin, MA 01503 | $430 |
135 | Thomas J Colyer | Hubbardston, MA 01452 | $419 |
136 | Raymond G Robinson Jr | Hardwick, MA 01037 | $378 |
137 | R H Robinson | Paxton, MA 01612 | $355 |
138 | Arlene Joyal | Barre, MA 01005 | $354 |
139 | Howard Ballou | Douglas, MA 01516 | $352 |
140 | Shirley Mosczynski | Douglas, MA 01516 | $338 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”