Loan Deficiency in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 110
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Worcester County, Massachusetts totaled $755,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Country Ayre Farm | Spencer, MA 01562 | $84,597 |
2 | Carter And Stevens | Barre, MA 01005 | $37,949 |
3 | Jordan Dairy Farm Inc | Rutland, MA 01543 | $34,435 |
4 | Szerlag Farms | Northbridge, MA 01534 | $32,471 |
5 | Henry And Cecelia Imbier | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $28,845 |
6 | Raymond G Robinson Dba Robinson Farm | Hardwick, MA 01037 | $27,476 |
7 | Frank W Matheson Jr | Littleton, MA 01460 | $25,182 |
8 | Whittier Farms Inc | Sutton, MA 01590 | $25,171 |
9 | Gerald And Tammi Visser | Uxbridge, MA 01569 | $21,545 |
10 | Ox-bow Acres | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $20,565 |
11 | Schultz Farm | Rutland, MA 01543 | $19,168 |
12 | Robert And Margaret Moschini | Spencer, MA 01562 | $17,559 |
13 | William Davis Jr | Ware, MA 01082 | $17,422 |
14 | Walnut Lane LLC | Dudley, MA 01571 | $16,870 |
15 | Daniel E Hanson | Gilbertville, MA 01031 | $15,219 |
16 | David And Ruth Shepard | Warren, MA 01083 | $15,172 |
17 | Podbelski Farm | Gilbertville, MA 01031 | $14,130 |
18 | Manuel S Moreira | Lancaster, MA 01523 | $13,864 |
19 | James Talvy | West Brookfield, MA 01585 | $13,673 |
20 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $12,468 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>