CCC Organic Programs in Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 264
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in Michigan totaled $153,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Catherine King | Brooklyn, MI 49230 | $1,000 |
22 | Engelhard Family Farms LLC | Unionville, MI 48767 | $1,000 |
23 | Bear Creek Organics LLC | Petoskey, MI 49770 | $1,000 |
24 | Collaborative Advantage Marketing | Detroit, MI 48207 | $1,000 |
25 | Dekam Organics Inc | Falmouth, MI 49632 | $1,000 |
26 | Eden Foods Inc | Clinton, MI 49236 | $1,000 |
27 | , | $1,000 | |
28 | , | $1,000 | |
29 | , | $1,000 | |
30 | Nutcase Vegan Meats | Wyoming, MI 49548 | $983 |
31 | Leon Jones | Adrian, MI 49221 | $941 |
32 | Winters Calico Fields Farm LLC Joshua James Winter | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $902 |
33 | La Casa Verde Produce, LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $898 |
34 | Golden Field Organics LLC | Brownstown, MI 48134 | $890 |
35 | Matt Guindon | Cornell, MI 49818 | $873 |
36 | Craig Lackscheide | Vermontville, MI 49096 | $848 |
37 | Hi-lo Acres LLC | Portland, MI 48875 | $833 |
38 | Nature And Nurture LLC | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $828 |
39 | Matthew James Drallette | Climax, MI 49034 | $800 |
40 | Thomas L Salisbury | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $797 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”