Lamb Meat Adjustment Program in Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 734
Recipients of Lamb Meat Adjustment Program from farms in Michigan totaled $979,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Lamb Meat Adjustment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Mary Jo Crossman | Ionia, MI 48846 | $1,163 |
202 | Ralph Hemmer | Levering, MI 49755 | $1,162 |
203 | Hoolsema Farms | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $1,155 |
204 | Scott Brown | Hillsdale, MI 49242 | $1,152 |
205 | Paul M Oesterle | Mason, MI 48854 | $1,150 |
206 | Martin P Galbraith | Mio, MI 48647 | $1,140 |
207 | Mary Dee Sist Dvm | Williamston, MI 48895 | $1,130 |
208 | Russell E Lewis | Evart, MI 49631 | $1,124 |
209 | Julius M Simon | Pewamo, MI 48873 | $1,115 |
210 | John Orvis | Marion, MI 49665 | $1,106 |
211 | Gerald Dennison | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $1,106 |
212 | Raymond S Gavin | Gaines, MI 48436 | $1,105 |
213 | Elizabeth L Waffle | Milan, MI 48160 | $1,092 |
214 | Donna D Baum | Bull Shoals, AR 72619 | $1,089 |
215 | Riley Wyant | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $1,080 |
216 | Petru Polocoser | Carleton, MI 48117 | $1,080 |
217 | William F Kraniak | Merrill, MI 48637 | $1,076 |
218 | H E Dingman | Bellevue, MI 49021 | $1,072 |
219 | Jeannine Ann Doan | Hanover, MI 49241 | $1,067 |
220 | Douglas Hanchett | Sterling, MI 48659 | $1,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”