Farm Subsidy information
Michigan
Total Subsidies in Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 85,829
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Michigan totaled $8,606,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Pridgeon Farms LLC | Montgomery, MI 49255 | $2,847,848 |
62 | R Schapman Ptr Dba Ingleside Farms | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $2,829,791 |
63 | Hawkins Homestead | Mason, MI 48854 | $2,818,407 |
64 | Hoeksma Farms | Freeport, MI 49325 | $2,768,061 |
65 | Diffin Farms | Burt, MI 48417 | $2,759,851 |
66 | T & H Dairy II | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $2,737,859 |
67 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $2,705,577 |
68 | Hewitt Farms | Swartz Creek, MI 48473 | $2,699,797 |
69 | Dutch Meadows Dairy LLC | Fowler, MI 48835 | $2,696,300 |
70 | Harold Jerdon Hamlin | South Haven, MI 49090 | $2,686,261 |
71 | Rolling Meadows Farms LLC | Jones, MI 49061 | $2,637,582 |
72 | Walnutdale Family Farms LLC | Wayland, MI 49348 | $2,635,234 |
73 | Lennard Ag Company | Samaria, MI 48177 | $2,624,469 |
74 | Howe Farms | Horton, MI 49246 | $2,623,128 |
75 | Sackrider Farms LLC | Battle Creek, MI 49014 | $2,617,942 |
76 | Cole Riverview Farms Inc | Bancroft, MI 48414 | $2,591,403 |
77 | Kimerer Farms | Britton, MI 49229 | $2,587,692 |
78 | Little Creeks | Mason, MI 48854 | $2,564,985 |
79 | Prielipp Farms | Britton, MI 49229 | $2,564,157 |
80 | Walter James Stafford Jr | Richland, MI 49083 | $2,549,346 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”