Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 177
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Michigan totaled $9,496,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Heather A Davis | Marlette, MI 48453 | $10,199 |
62 | Dena D Erwin | Concord, MI 49237 | $9,390 |
63 | Daniel Brenner | Free Soil, MI 49411 | $8,802 |
64 | Raymond L Kussmaul | Clinton, MI 49236 | $8,784 |
65 | All Out Whitetails LLC | Muskegon, MI 49445 | $8,663 |
66 | William Hathaway | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $8,604 |
67 | Gary Randall | Elwell, MI 48832 | $8,554 |
68 | Dennis Mcgahan | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $7,741 |
69 | , | $7,604 | |
70 | B Hannar Apiaries LLC | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $7,055 |
71 | Jodi Bee Honey Farm Inc. | Clarkston, MI 48348 | $6,468 |
72 | Gail Lee Mcilmurray | Hale, MI 48739 | $6,237 |
73 | , | $6,015 | |
74 | Dane Wallis | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $5,999 |
75 | Suzanna E Raker | Calumet, MI 49913 | $5,749 |
76 | Kolar Farms LLC | Minden City, MI 48456 | $5,703 |
77 | Thomas Nebel | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $5,677 |
78 | Leslie R Mcbean | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $5,589 |
79 | James Bellville | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $5,359 |
80 | Stefan Zbarcha | Ortonville, MI 48462 | $5,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”