Conservation Reserve Program in Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 22,361
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Michigan totaled $562,114,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Alfred Halasz | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $340,412 |
82 | Wesley Federspiel | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $339,008 |
83 | Clifford Zimmerman | Auburn, MI 48611 | $337,888 |
84 | Randy Vollmar | Cass City, MI 48726 | $336,469 |
85 | Kretzschmer Brothers | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $333,564 |
86 | Gold Coast Farms | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $330,008 |
87 | Chester Kurowicki Estate | Tecumseh, MI 49286 | $329,884 |
88 | Edward Spinazzola | Ray, MI 48096 | $329,024 |
89 | Ottawa County | West Olive, MI 49460 | $327,855 |
90 | Section 32 Farms LLC | Saginaw, MI 48638 | $327,356 |
91 | Marilyn A Hutchins | Camden, MI 49232 | $327,080 |
92 | Arthur Mclincha | Rhodes, MI 48652 | $325,822 |
93 | William Potter | East Lansing, MI 48823 | $325,807 |
94 | Kevin James Molter | Hudson, MI 49247 | $325,170 |
95 | Charles F Schaffner | Hudson, MI 49247 | $324,246 |
96 | Curt Carroll Johnson | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $319,162 |
97 | Robert W Decoe | Mayville, MI 48744 | $317,955 |
98 | Linda M Gembarski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $316,897 |
99 | Donald J Smith | Hemlock, MI 48626 | $316,637 |
100 | Ronald Wallace | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $315,656 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”