Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 172
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Michigan totaled $306,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Stephen W Tuinstra | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $47 |
122 | Barbara M Smith | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $46 |
123 | James P Oswalt | Fulton, MI 49052 | $43 |
124 | Jacob Smith | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $41 |
125 | Ronald Schoen | Frankenmuth, MI 48734 | $37 |
126 | Harner Farms LLC | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $34 |
127 | Michael L Kline II | Scotts, MI 49088 | $34 |
128 | Jerred Austin Melville | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $34 |
129 | Christian James Wedel | Mendon, MI 49072 | $31 |
130 | Jack Peckham | Climax, MI 49034 | $29 |
131 | Rice Farms LLC | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $29 |
132 | Struble Farms LLC | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $29 |
133 | Rodney Vanmiddlesworth | Fulton, MI 49052 | $28 |
134 | Sue Ann Vanmiddlesworth | Fulton, MI 49052 | $28 |
135 | Douglas Alan Myers | Ceresco, MI 49033 | $26 |
136 | Riley Matthew Skrzypek | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $24 |
137 | John E Letts | Climax, MI 49034 | $20 |
138 | Christopher A Gallup | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $20 |
139 | James Dalgord | Garden, MI 49835 | $19 |
140 | Vern Verduin & Sons LLC | Caledonia, MI 49316 | $19 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”