Farm Subsidy information
Michigan
Total Subsidies in Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 23,108
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Michigan totaled $850,242,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Reed Family Farms LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $1,124,424 |
| 42 | Highland Dairy LLC | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $1,122,543 |
| 43 | Nvf Inc | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $1,121,099 |
| 44 | Dutch Meadows Dairy LLC | Fowler, MI 48835 | $1,106,133 |
| 45 | River Ridge Farms Inc | Coopersville, MI 49404 | $1,105,016 |
| 46 | De Saegher Dairy Inc | Middleton, MI 48856 | $1,098,659 |
| 47 | Laier Farms Inc | Howell, MI 48855 | $1,097,281 |
| 48 | Aquila Farms LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,096,671 |
| 49 | Cow Pleasant Dairy Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $1,067,920 |
| 50 | Barton Farm Co | Homer, MI 49245 | $1,064,259 |
| 51 | Berlyn Acres II LLC | Fowler, MI 48835 | $1,050,719 |
| 52 | Prairie View Dairy LLC | Delton, MI 49046 | $1,048,792 |
| 53 | Hooks Farms | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $1,044,884 |
| 54 | J & J Bee Service Inc | Kalamazoo, MI 49004 | $1,033,600 |
| 55 | Sackett Potatoes | Mecosta, MI 49332 | $1,030,788 |
| 56 | Weir Farms | Hanover, MI 49241 | $1,027,597 |
| 57 | Nobis Dairy Farms | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $1,019,619 |
| 58 | Maplewood Farms LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $1,019,586 |
| 59 | Veddler Dairy Farm Inc | Marion, MI 49665 | $1,014,708 |
| 60 | Deyoung Pork Inc | Plainwell, MI 49080 | $1,014,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf