Counter Cyclical Program in Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 27,147
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Michigan totaled $155,515,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | R Schapman Ptr Dba Ingleside Farms | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $119,439 |
| 42 | Halbert Dairy Farm LLC | Battle Creek, MI 49017 | $118,929 |
| 43 | Clifford Wilson And Sons Inc | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $118,400 |
| 44 | Paul Main | Six Lakes, MI 48886 | $117,459 |
| 45 | Hoeksma Farms | Freeport, MI 49325 | $116,803 |
| 46 | Irish Farms | Burt, MI 48417 | $116,550 |
| 47 | Mallow Farms LLC | Bronson, MI 49028 | $115,957 |
| 48 | Russell & Sons Farms LLC | Akron, MI 48701 | $115,760 |
| 49 | Kubiak Farms | Webberville, MI 48892 | $113,246 |
| 50 | Cornerstone Acres | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $112,250 |
| 51 | County Of Muskegon | Muskegon, MI 49442 | $112,248 |
| 52 | Butcher Farms | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $111,404 |
| 53 | Storehalder Farms | Waldron, MI 49288 | $111,280 |
| 54 | Howe Farms | Horton, MI 49246 | $110,842 |
| 55 | Johnson Farms | Otisville, MI 48463 | $109,959 |
| 56 | Terwillegar Farms | Midland, MI 48640 | $108,980 |
| 57 | Cremer Farms, L.l.c. | Williamston, MI 48895 | $108,727 |
| 58 | Double Eagle Farms | Marshall, MI 49068 | $108,436 |
| 59 | Scenic View Dairy LLC | Holland, MI 49423 | $107,616 |
| 60 | Mammoth Grove Farms | Centreville, MI 49032 | $107,256 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf