Market Gains in Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,506
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Michigan totaled $52,468,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John B Anibal | Durand, MI 48429 | $166,075 |
42 | Scenic View Poultry Farms | Saugatuck, MI 49453 | $165,694 |
43 | Goetz River Farms Inc | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $164,009 |
44 | Harold Jerdon Hamlin | South Haven, MI 49090 | $162,606 |
45 | Fike Brothers | Manitou Beach, MI 49253 | $162,088 |
46 | Dale Philip Seyfred | Galien, MI 49113 | $160,809 |
47 | Caister Farms Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $157,417 |
48 | Collier Farms | Allegan, MI 49010 | $156,907 |
49 | Konos Inc | Martin, MI 49070 | $156,243 |
50 | Stanley J Leep | Martin, MI 49070 | $153,889 |
51 | Michael J Hunt | Lake Odessa, MI 48849 | $147,692 |
52 | Eckert Farms | Freeport, MI 49325 | $147,431 |
53 | Tri-acre Farms | Davison, MI 48423 | $146,219 |
54 | John D Warner | Tipton, MI 49287 | $144,685 |
55 | Barryville Farms | Nashville, MI 49073 | $144,574 |
56 | Mary Elizabeth Horton | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $142,534 |
57 | Rodney Glen Horton | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $142,534 |
58 | Sackrider Farms LLC | Battle Creek, MI 49014 | $141,987 |
59 | Donald Eric Black | North Adams, MI 49262 | $138,370 |
60 | Mark Jeffery Kies | Allen, MI 49227 | $136,577 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”