Total Commodity Programs in Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 71,196
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Michigan totaled $4,990,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sackrider Farms LLC | Battle Creek, MI 49014 | $2,617,942 |
62 | Lennard Ag Company | Samaria, MI 48177 | $2,611,140 |
63 | Godfrey Farms | Jonesville, MI 49250 | $2,589,805 |
64 | T & H Dairy II | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $2,572,371 |
65 | Little Creeks | Mason, MI 48854 | $2,563,950 |
66 | Johnson Farms LLC | Daggett, MI 49821 | $2,557,879 |
67 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $2,538,753 |
68 | Poll Farms Inc | Hamilton, MI 49419 | $2,503,623 |
69 | Kleinheksel Farm 2006 | Holland, MI 49423 | $2,491,447 |
70 | Rolling Meadows Farms LLC | Jones, MI 49061 | $2,490,338 |
71 | Dutch Meadows Dairy LLC | Fowler, MI 48835 | $2,472,731 |
72 | Ken Miller Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $2,471,371 |
73 | Walnutdale Family Farms LLC | Wayland, MI 49348 | $2,458,944 |
74 | Cornerstone Acres | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $2,455,609 |
75 | Double Eagle Farms | Marshall, MI 49068 | $2,417,231 |
76 | Howe Farms | Horton, MI 49246 | $2,408,453 |
77 | Fred Feight & Sons LLC | Tecumseh, MI 49286 | $2,408,092 |
78 | Cole Riverview Farms Inc | Bancroft, MI 48414 | $2,396,060 |
79 | Pork Chop Hill Farm LLC | Reading, MI 49274 | $2,334,051 |
80 | Harold Jerdon Hamlin | South Haven, MI 49090 | $2,330,740 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”