Farm Subsidy information
Michigan
Total Subsidies in Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 85,829
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Michigan totaled $8,606,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sackett Potatoes | Mecosta, MI 49332 | $3,977,763 |
22 | Kenny Brothers Farm Partnership | Merrill, MI 48637 | $3,968,843 |
23 | Stark Farms | Niles, MI 49120 | $3,632,824 |
24 | Pidd Brothers Farm | Stockbridge, MI 49285 | $3,607,521 |
25 | Kurncz Farms Inc | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $3,598,342 |
26 | Barton Farm Co | Homer, MI 49245 | $3,577,480 |
27 | Johnson Farms LLC | Daggett, MI 49821 | $3,527,968 |
28 | Hasenick Brothers | Albion, MI 49224 | $3,514,815 |
29 | Halbert Dairy Farm LLC | Battle Creek, MI 49017 | $3,465,385 |
30 | J & J Bee Service Inc | Kalamazoo, MI 49004 | $3,441,205 |
31 | Curt Albright Farms | Coldwater, MI 49036 | $3,429,215 |
32 | Psy | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $3,394,042 |
33 | Golden Acres Farms | Jasper, MI 49248 | $3,389,823 |
34 | Ken Or Doug Stautz | Marshall, MI 49068 | $3,383,000 |
35 | Kleinheksel Farms | Holland, MI 49423 | $3,351,067 |
36 | Irish Farms | Burt, MI 48417 | $3,307,605 |
37 | Watters And Sons Farm | Stockbridge, MI 49285 | $3,268,080 |
38 | Cremer Farms, L.l.c. | Williamston, MI 48895 | $3,266,311 |
39 | Maplewood Farms LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $3,261,354 |
40 | Schluckebier Bros | Bridgeport, MI 48722 | $3,251,356 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”