Market Loss Assistance Program in Alcona County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 103
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Alcona County, Michigan totaled $550,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James W Stone | Barton City, MI 48705 | $291 |
82 | Edward M Moskwa | Lincoln, MI 48742 | $273 |
83 | Carole Campbell | Harrisville, MI 48740 | $251 |
84 | Keith L Sharboneau | Alpena, MI 49707 | $249 |
85 | Stanley F Keerl | Harrisville, MI 48740 | $249 |
86 | Mark D Macneill | Barton City, MI 48705 | $239 |
87 | Wilbur Garrett | Glennie, MI 48737 | $225 |
88 | Stanley E Lee | Mikado, MI 48745 | $215 |
89 | Phyllis Stone | Lincoln Park, MI 48146 | $192 |
90 | James Lee Flannery | Clio, MI 48420 | $184 |
91 | Gerald Ward | Harrisville, MI 48740 | $183 |
92 | William Roszczewski | Dryden, MI 48428 | $174 |
93 | Luckie Moskwa | Lincoln, MI 48742 | $159 |
94 | Katherine Hale | Lincoln, MI 48742 | $131 |
95 | Maurice Dellar | Harrisville, MI 48740 | $57 |
96 | Murray J Campbell Jr | Harrisville, MI 48740 | $52 |
97 | David Sterner | Harrisville, MI 48740 | $44 |
98 | Robert Franklin | Lincoln, MI 48742 | $44 |
99 | Cecil Mcdonald | Mikado, MI 48745 | $30 |
100 | Kevin Small | Curran, MI 48728 | $21 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”