Farm Subsidy information
Alpena County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Alpena County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 321 to 340 of 705
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alpena County, Michigan totaled $30,636,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
321 | Peter Valentine | Dearborn Heights, MI 48127 | $4,221 |
322 | Tim Baker | Lachine, MI 49753 | $4,201 |
323 | William Bahling | Alpena, MI 49707 | $4,200 |
324 | Robert Kaiser | Herron, MI 49744 | $4,190 |
325 | Kevin Newhouse | Hubbard Lake, MI 49747 | $4,175 |
326 | Fred Oliver | Lachine, MI 49753 | $3,979 |
327 | Tyler Brandt | Hillman, MI 49746 | $3,971 |
328 | Frank Bahling | Lachine, MI 49753 | $3,957 |
329 | Evelyn Werth | Alpena, MI 49707 | $3,941 |
330 | Eldon Herron | Lachine, MI 49753 | $3,936 |
331 | Louis Martell | Las Vegas, NV 89103 | $3,935 |
332 | Sharon Wyman | Posen, MI 49776 | $3,871 |
333 | Mike Eagling | Posen, MI 49776 | $3,843 |
334 | Marian F Klebs | Hillman, MI 49746 | $3,830 |
335 | Greg Oliver | Lachine, MI 49753 | $3,800 |
336 | Wilbur Wilke | Alpena, MI 49707 | $3,746 |
337 | Judith Langerfeld | Hubbard Lake, MI 49747 | $3,738 |
338 | Roy Bartz | Hubbard Lake, MI 49747 | $3,720 |
339 | Inglis Farms Inc | Alpena, MI 49707 | $3,631 |
340 | Terry Krentz | Ossineke, MI 49766 | $3,593 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”