Dairy Programs in Arenac County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 67
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Arenac County, Michigan totaled $4,667,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Glenn Martin Berry | Sterling, MI 48659 | $90,405 |
22 | Pinegrove Farms | Standish, MI 48658 | $70,615 |
23 | Kenneth G Daniels | Sterling, MI 48659 | $70,017 |
24 | Salgat Farms LLC | Twining, MI 48766 | $69,864 |
25 | Daniel L Fisk | Sterling, MI 48659 | $68,672 |
26 | Hill High Dairy Farm | Standish, MI 48658 | $58,625 |
27 | Melvin J Salgat | Twining, MI 48766 | $57,266 |
28 | Dale Fisk | Chatham, MI 49816 | $50,336 |
29 | Aaron Lee Ostroski | Sterling, MI 48659 | $46,566 |
30 | William Hartwick | Sterling, MI 48659 | $39,237 |
31 | Donald P Benchley | Sterling, MI 48659 | $38,689 |
32 | Robert C Stein | Standish, MI 48658 | $29,254 |
33 | Alan Jantzi | Au Gres, MI 48703 | $21,918 |
34 | Twin Dairy | Sterling, MI 48659 | $15,259 |
35 | Larry Prohaska | Standish, MI 48658 | $9,946 |
36 | Kevin J Mctaggart | Sterling, MI 48659 | $9,096 |
37 | Jeffrey Trombley | Standish, MI 48658 | $9,047 |
38 | Ash Grove Dairy LLC | Sterling, MI 48659 | $8,212 |
39 | Robert Lee Schmidt | Standish, MI 48658 | $7,880 |
40 | Jacob Ostroski | Sterling, MI 48659 | $7,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”