Farm Subsidy information
Arenac County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Arenac County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,384
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arenac County, Michigan totaled $96,108,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Craig D Ratajczak | Standish, MI 48658 | $587,284 |
22 | Ronald Rosiek | Standish, MI 48658 | $576,033 |
23 | Todd Stodolak | Standish, MI 48658 | $568,782 |
24 | Pine Grove Farm LLC | Standish, MI 48658 | $558,090 |
25 | Lynn Schmidt | Standish, MI 48658 | $536,838 |
26 | Thomas Jurek | Standish, MI 48658 | $534,002 |
27 | Allan Kuehnemund | Au Gres, MI 48703 | $524,131 |
28 | Twin Dairy | Sterling, MI 48659 | $513,959 |
29 | Randy Lalonde | Bentley, MI 48613 | $513,424 |
30 | Gulvas Farms LLC | Standish, MI 48658 | $497,450 |
31 | Kent Richard Swartz | Turner, MI 48765 | $481,656 |
32 | Allen H Schmidt | Standish, MI 48658 | $461,608 |
33 | Thomas Allen Johnson | Standish, MI 48658 | $453,583 |
34 | Mitchell P Pula | Omer, MI 48749 | $453,175 |
35 | Dwight And Marvin Selle Inc | Au Gres, MI 48703 | $447,407 |
36 | William Huber | Au Gres, MI 48703 | $435,473 |
37 | Aaron Lee Ostroski | Sterling, MI 48659 | $423,009 |
38 | Duane Browne | Twining, MI 48766 | $421,404 |
39 | Larry Prohaska | Standish, MI 48658 | $421,286 |
40 | Victor Daniels And Sons | Sterling, MI 48659 | $420,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”