Conservation Reserve Program in Bay County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 634
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $16,874,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Oak Grove Beach Properities LLC | Essexville, MI 48732 | $143,649 |
22 | Alan Gornowicz | Saginaw, MI 48601 | $143,482 |
23 | Ggc Enterprises LLC | Rhodes, MI 48652 | $142,867 |
24 | Ronald Gerald Rokosz | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $140,348 |
25 | Kanicki Farms LLC | Bay City, MI 48708 | $131,852 |
26 | Diane Blehm | Bentley, MI 48613 | $130,081 |
27 | John Kuenker | Bay City, MI 48706 | $129,333 |
28 | Ronald N Bourdon Sr | Bentley, MI 48613 | $129,157 |
29 | Kathrin S Schrouder | Bentley, MI 48613 | $125,277 |
30 | G & R Vandriessche Farms | Bay City, MI 48708 | $120,184 |
31 | Ann Gray | Auburn, MI 48611 | $114,873 |
32 | Sharon Hooper | Linwood, MI 48634 | $110,847 |
33 | Leonard Pintoski | Warren, MI 48088 | $108,582 |
34 | John P Burk | Bay City, MI 48706 | $107,796 |
35 | Terry Histed | Munger, MI 48747 | $104,884 |
36 | Grant Property Management | Freeland, MI 48623 | $100,083 |
37 | John A Herbolsheimer | Bay City, MI 48708 | $99,120 |
38 | Harry Faunce | Bentley, MI 48613 | $98,228 |
39 | Michelle Butcher | West Branch, MI 48661 | $94,975 |
40 | Larry Giebelhaus Trust | Midland, MI 48642 | $92,996 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”