Conservation Reserve Program in Bay County, Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 196
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $566,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Orwin J Martin | Auburn, MI 48611 | $1,200 |
102 | James Tarkowski | Linwood, MI 48634 | $1,184 |
103 | Donnie Setser | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,180 |
104 | Susan Hoffmann | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $1,152 |
105 | David Appold | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,148 |
106 | Tom Herner | Bentley, MI 48613 | $1,142 |
107 | Scott Wenglikowski | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,137 |
108 | Craig Kubacki | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,127 |
109 | Jack Knochel | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $1,074 |
110 | Matthew Burk | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,069 |
111 | Randy Edward Bauer | Auburn, MI 48611 | $1,049 |
112 | Dennis Resmer | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $1,037 |
113 | William Hugo | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $1,009 |
114 | Gerald Krohn | Essexville, MI 48732 | $1,007 |
115 | , | $961 | |
116 | French Farms | Munger, MI 48747 | $926 |
117 | Janet M Holka | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $902 |
118 | Donald Krzysik | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $848 |
119 | Constance R Jane | Bay City, MI 48706 | $811 |
120 | Kelly Jean Ratajczak | Munger, MI 48747 | $794 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”