Total Conservation Programs in Bay County, Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 203
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $574,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Timothy M Naert | Linwood, MI 48634 | $1,341 |
102 | James Vandenboom | Munger, MI 48747 | $1,327 |
103 | Donald J Labean Jr | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $1,258 |
104 | Stephen Duranczyk | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $1,234 |
105 | Orwin J Martin | Auburn, MI 48611 | $1,200 |
106 | James Tarkowski | Linwood, MI 48634 | $1,184 |
107 | Donnie Setser | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,180 |
108 | , | $1,159 | |
109 | Susan Hoffmann | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $1,152 |
110 | David Appold | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,148 |
111 | Raymond Wenglikowski | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,137 |
112 | Craig Kubacki | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,127 |
113 | James Cianek | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $1,103 |
114 | Jack Knochel | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $1,074 |
115 | Matthew Burk | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,069 |
116 | Randy Edward Bauer | Auburn, MI 48611 | $1,049 |
117 | William Hugo | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $1,009 |
118 | Gerald Krohn | Essexville, MI 48732 | $1,007 |
119 | French Farms | Munger, MI 48747 | $926 |
120 | Frank Farms Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $912 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”