Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Bay County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 397
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $6,690,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Beyer Farms Inc | Munger, MI 48747 | $15,648 |
122 | Steven Schultz | Bay City, MI 48708 | $15,135 |
123 | Mark J Lahar | Linwood, MI 48634 | $14,938 |
124 | Bill Johnson Potato Farm LLC | Bay City, MI 48706 | $14,911 |
125 | David Krzyzaniak | Linwood, MI 48634 | $14,748 |
126 | Kenneth Labean Sr | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $14,460 |
127 | Saginaw Bay Farms | Bay City, MI 48708 | $14,046 |
128 | Gerald Resmer | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $13,875 |
129 | Duaine Vogel | Bay City, MI 48706 | $13,741 |
130 | Rod W Bublitz | Essexville, MI 48732 | $13,739 |
131 | John P Burk | Bay City, MI 48706 | $13,463 |
132 | James Hugo | Essexville, MI 48732 | $13,197 |
133 | William Krengielski Farms Inc | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $12,801 |
134 | Julie Loesel | Auburn, MI 48611 | $12,694 |
135 | Anthony Krengielski | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $12,583 |
136 | Edward Vanochten | Munger, MI 48747 | $12,527 |
137 | Bruce D Shurlow | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $12,385 |
138 | G & R Vandriessche Farms | Bay City, MI 48708 | $12,262 |
139 | Earl Tacey | Essexville, MI 48732 | $12,183 |
140 | Richard Ruhnau | Midland, MI 48642 | $12,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”