Farm Subsidy information
Bay County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Bay County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 602
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $8,491,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Patrick Krengielski Jr | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $9,296 |
142 | Archie Bauer | Bay City, MI 48706 | $9,277 |
143 | Tom Richard | Bay City, MI 48708 | $9,201 |
144 | Vandriessche Brothers LLC | Bay City, MI 48708 | $9,196 |
145 | Knochel Farms Inc | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $9,172 |
146 | Essexville Jacobs Farm Inc | Essexville, MI 48732 | $9,151 |
147 | Backus Farms | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $9,139 |
148 | Joshua Schlicker | Bay City, MI 48706 | $8,922 |
149 | Kenn Wackerle | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $8,917 |
150 | Lynch Schabel | Munger, MI 48747 | $8,889 |
151 | Thomas Frank Fedak | Linwood, MI 48634 | $8,790 |
152 | Nicholas Thomas Rugenstein | Linwood, MI 48634 | $8,782 |
153 | Paul E Pett | Bay City, MI 48708 | $8,757 |
154 | William Krengielski Farms Inc | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $8,739 |
155 | Mike Wilson | Bay City, MI 48706 | $8,681 |
156 | Steven P Lanczak | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $8,540 |
157 | Robert Kernstock | Auburn, MI 48611 | $8,539 |
158 | Sharon Hooper | Linwood, MI 48634 | $8,525 |
159 | Logan Allan Jonas | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $8,500 |
160 | Ray Lefevre | Auburn, MI 48611 | $8,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”