Farm Subsidy information
Bay County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Bay County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,253
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $192,977,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deshano Farms Inc | Auburn, MI 48611 | $1,967,996 |
2 | Weber Dairy Farms LLC | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $1,682,498 |
3 | Helmreich Farms Inc | Freeland, MI 48623 | $1,588,267 |
4 | Stockmeyer Family Farms | Reese, MI 48757 | $1,581,440 |
5 | M & D Huber Farms | Auburn, MI 48611 | $1,545,651 |
6 | Meylan Farms Inc | Auburn, MI 48611 | $1,442,825 |
7 | K & L Schultz Farms | Bay City, MI 48708 | $1,420,031 |
8 | Michael J Krzyzaniak | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $1,383,553 |
9 | Johnsons Farm Co Inc | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $1,081,017 |
10 | John P Burk | Bay City, MI 48706 | $1,041,805 |
11 | Mieske Farms Inc | Linwood, MI 48634 | $941,010 |
12 | W W Schultz & Sons Inc | Linwood, MI 48634 | $926,528 |
13 | Ronald Gerald Rokosz | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $921,692 |
14 | Thomas Vanochten | Essexville, MI 48732 | $899,762 |
15 | Jonas Farms | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $894,549 |
16 | Frank Farms Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $862,048 |
17 | D & J Helmreich Farms Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $847,346 |
18 | Schindler Farms LLC | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $847,217 |
19 | M & K Farms Inc | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $842,246 |
20 | Terry Powers | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $804,822 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>