Farm Subsidy information
Bay County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Bay County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 602
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $8,491,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eugene Arthur Meylan | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $39,697 |
22 | Kenneth Powers | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $39,247 |
23 | D T Rouech Farms LLC | Bay City, MI 48708 | $38,768 |
24 | Anthony J Chomas | Bentley, MI 48613 | $37,978 |
25 | M & K Farms Inc | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $37,862 |
26 | Jerry Knochel | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $37,835 |
27 | Harry Gaiser Jr | Bay City, MI 48706 | $37,513 |
28 | Deshano Farms Inc | Auburn, MI 48611 | $37,300 |
29 | Fleischmann Farms Inc | Munger, MI 48747 | $36,571 |
30 | Keith Durussel | Reese, MI 48757 | $35,384 |
31 | Philip Bublitz | Bay City, MI 48708 | $34,960 |
32 | Michael Herman Schmidt | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $34,694 |
33 | Kenneth Vandenboom | Munger, MI 48747 | $34,336 |
34 | Tommy Weiss | Bay City, MI 48706 | $33,398 |
35 | Dzurka Bros LLC | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $33,336 |
36 | Jason Gaiser | Bay City, MI 48706 | $33,045 |
37 | Ronald Gerald Rokosz | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $32,685 |
38 | Wayne L Wackerle Jr | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $30,145 |
39 | Mieske Farms Inc | Linwood, MI 48634 | $29,145 |
40 | Frank Farms Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $29,101 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”