Conservation Reserve Program in Berrien County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 262
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Berrien County, Michigan totaled $4,115,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert J Gonder | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $23,166 |
42 | David D Gonder | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $23,166 |
43 | Jerome Drazer | Kouts, IN 46347 | $23,040 |
44 | Alvin Tomoske Jr | Sodus, MI 49126 | $23,020 |
45 | Joan Forburger | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $22,312 |
46 | John Brantley | Benton Harbor, MI 49022 | $22,233 |
47 | Karl Gollnast | Bridgman, MI 49106 | $22,159 |
48 | Edwin Radewald | Niles, MI 49120 | $21,866 |
49 | Janice Sudnik | Naperville, IL 60540 | $21,810 |
50 | Robert Jacob | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $21,600 |
51 | Sherwood Snyder III | Chicago, IL 60614 | $21,448 |
52 | Jacob Milliken | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $21,423 |
53 | William A Priest | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $21,420 |
54 | Charles W Franklin & Margaret A Franklin Revocable | Marblehead, MA 01945 | $20,698 |
55 | Paul Strefling | Galien, MI 49113 | $20,184 |
56 | John Schadler | Niles, MI 49120 | $20,168 |
57 | Barbara Kettlehut | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $20,160 |
58 | David Koehler | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $19,744 |
59 | Sandra L Barefield | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $19,642 |
60 | Elsie Rantz | Watervliet, MI 49098 | $19,580 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”