Farm Subsidy information
Berrien County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Berrien County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,654
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Berrien County, Michigan totaled $215,001,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Susan Lee Seyfred | Galien, MI 49113 | $1,055,067 |
22 | Franklin Thomas James | Sodus, MI 49126 | $1,038,246 |
23 | Bryan Bixby | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $999,312 |
24 | Kaminski Farms Inc | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $979,594 |
25 | Andrews University | Berrien Springs, MI 49104 | $974,128 |
26 | Arrowhead Vineyards LLC | Baroda, MI 49101 | $938,456 |
27 | Snow Garden Farms | Baroda, MI 49101 | $935,433 |
28 | Harner Farms LLC | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $927,663 |
29 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $922,303 |
30 | Timothy Ferry | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $915,893 |
31 | Stephanie Joy Frank | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $913,608 |
32 | Marschke Farms LLC | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $909,520 |
33 | Jon Brian Hinkelman | Watervliet, MI 49098 | $889,402 |
34 | Leonard E Frank | Berrien Center, MI 49102 | $831,612 |
35 | Shane Toby Masten | Niles, MI 49120 | $826,492 |
36 | Larry L Richter | Galien, MI 49113 | $762,942 |
37 | Michael O Moore | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $762,103 |
38 | Fruit Acres Farm Market | Coloma, MI 49038 | $750,544 |
39 | Seldom Rest Enterprises | Niles, MI 49120 | $745,150 |
40 | Daniel C Schultz Sr | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $721,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”