Counter Cyclical Program in Berrien County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 379
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Berrien County, Michigan totaled $2,758,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Maple View Farms LLC | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $31,738 |
| 22 | Kenneth Wayne Seifert | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $31,729 |
| 23 | Andrews University | Berrien Springs, MI 49104 | $29,938 |
| 24 | Best Brothers | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $29,628 |
| 25 | Hazen Harner Jr | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $27,525 |
| 26 | Nancy Koebel | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $27,303 |
| 27 | Jerry Koebel Sr | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $27,303 |
| 28 | William Charles Schlutt | Baroda, MI 49101 | $26,124 |
| 29 | Robson Farms LLC | Niles, MI 49120 | $25,299 |
| 30 | Michael O Moore | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $23,913 |
| 31 | Kurt Klann | Niles, MI 49120 | $23,199 |
| 32 | Paul Gerhardt Kugler | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $21,371 |
| 33 | Scott Doepker | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $21,185 |
| 34 | Norris Clifford Young | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $20,487 |
| 35 | Shane Toby Masten | Niles, MI 49120 | $20,397 |
| 36 | Dean Leroy Luther | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $20,392 |
| 37 | Larry Lynn Camp | Niles, MI 49120 | $19,215 |
| 38 | Daniel C Schultz Sr | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $18,933 |
| 39 | Peter Zaluckyj | Coloma, MI 49038 | $18,931 |
| 40 | David Dohm Farms Dohm | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $18,341 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf