Total Commodity Programs in Berrien County, Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 235
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Berrien County, Michigan totaled $5,209,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | J D Layman Farms Inc | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $37,111 |
42 | Mike Gillette | Niles, MI 49120 | $36,783 |
43 | Teifke Farms LLC | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $36,424 |
44 | David T Demski | Sodus, MI 49126 | $35,847 |
45 | Powers Farm LLC | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $35,355 |
46 | Gary Hettlinger | Bridgman, MI 49106 | $34,503 |
47 | Andrews University | Berrien Springs, MI 49104 | $33,817 |
48 | Totzke Farms Properties LLC | Baroda, MI 49101 | $33,321 |
49 | David Luther | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $32,809 |
50 | Jacob Daniel Busick Jr | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $32,175 |
51 | Roger H Kugler Self Trust Agreement | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $31,702 |
52 | Jeffrey A Gaul | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $30,785 |
53 | A & B Costanza Farms LLC | Sodus, MI 49126 | $29,817 |
54 | Matthew Richard Critzer | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $29,269 |
55 | Totzke Farms LLC | Baroda, MI 49101 | $27,832 |
56 | Terry Koebel | Galien, MI 49113 | $27,370 |
57 | Kaminski Farms Inc | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $27,062 |
58 | Harvest Best Farms LLC | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $26,951 |
59 | David Dustin | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $26,673 |
60 | David Dohm Dohm Farms | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $26,395 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”