Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 224
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Michigan totaled $9,370,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Barton Farm Co | Homer, MI 49245 | $527,021 |
2 | B & V Farms LLC | Union City, MI 49094 | $249,739 |
3 | Holloo Farms LLC | Marshall, MI 49068 | $201,797 |
4 | Mr Kevin Lemans Vandybogurt | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $137,905 |
5 | K & L Farms Inc | Athens, MI 49011 | $121,663 |
6 | Randy Irving | Ceresco, MI 49033 | $108,215 |
7 | Maple Lane Farms | Marshall, MI 49068 | $100,845 |
8 | Larry Day | Battle Creek, MI 49014 | $98,321 |
9 | Dennis M Fuller | East Leroy, MI 49051 | $83,627 |
10 | Brent Vandenheede | Marshall, MI 49068 | $70,010 |
11 | Gregory J Hull | Union City, MI 49094 | $69,740 |
12 | , | $63,754 | |
13 | Irons Farms LLC | Athens, MI 49011 | $59,372 |
14 | James Lee Heisler | Springport, MI 49284 | $58,468 |
15 | Wil-o-brook Farms LLC | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $58,438 |
16 | Hiscock Farms Inc | Climax, MI 49034 | $54,469 |
17 | Wolk Farms LLC | Marshall, MI 49068 | $53,222 |
18 | Nickolas S Fast | Marshall, MI 49068 | $51,368 |
19 | Ryan A Ray | Burlington, MI 49029 | $51,262 |
20 | David R Bosserd | Marshall, MI 49068 | $42,304 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>