Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,074
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Michigan totaled $237,211,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Nearnberg Farms | Albion, MI 49224 | $827,571 |
42 | Frank Sutfin | Climax, MI 49034 | $823,742 |
43 | Brent Vandenheede | Marshall, MI 49068 | $819,012 |
44 | Morrell L Stealy Jr | Battle Creek, MI 49014 | $790,369 |
45 | B & V Farms LLC | Union City, MI 49094 | $787,025 |
46 | Phillip Todd Williams | Marshall, MI 49068 | $776,012 |
47 | Gloria Ziegler | Ceresco, MI 49033 | $764,769 |
48 | Wayne Weaver | Albion, MI 49224 | $760,216 |
49 | Hope Gloria Horton | Marshall, MI 49068 | $730,327 |
50 | Jeff Oberlin | Marshall, MI 49068 | $726,094 |
51 | Starr Cmnwlth Sch | Plymouth, MI 48170 | $723,234 |
52 | Washburn Acres LLC | Union City, MI 49094 | $722,957 |
53 | Mr Kevin Lemans Vandybogurt | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $697,598 |
54 | Hiscock Farms Inc | Climax, MI 49034 | $683,677 |
55 | Jeffrey A Willson | Marshall, MI 49068 | $661,184 |
56 | Fred Wayne Prichard | Burlington, MI 49029 | $658,538 |
57 | Mallory Craig Spradlin | Marshall, MI 49068 | $655,725 |
58 | Donald W Day | Ceresco, MI 49033 | $647,000 |
59 | Lloyd M Spencer | Albion, MI 49224 | $640,022 |
60 | Lori Oberlin | Marshall, MI 49068 | $638,883 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”