Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,053
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Michigan totaled $221,741,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Crandall Dairy Farms LLC | Battle Creek, MI 49017 | $1,235,057 |
22 | Edmond A Groholski | Burlington, MI 49029 | $1,153,522 |
23 | Eric Hiscock | Climax, MI 49034 | $1,144,643 |
24 | Eric J Phelps | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $1,142,174 |
25 | Brent Chamberlain | Homer, MI 49245 | $1,116,657 |
26 | Josephine Hoyt | Homer, MI 49245 | $1,084,447 |
27 | Elmer Heisler Jr | Albion, MI 49224 | $1,072,555 |
28 | Dennis M Fuller | East Leroy, MI 49051 | $1,033,842 |
29 | David James Vandenheede | Marshall, MI 49068 | $1,003,020 |
30 | Robert Glen Horton | Marshall, MI 49068 | $987,523 |
31 | Kiessling Family Farms Inc | Marshall, MI 49068 | $936,967 |
32 | Ryan Groholske | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $923,567 |
33 | Larry Day | Battle Creek, MI 49014 | $916,215 |
34 | Brian A Dietz | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $915,843 |
35 | Clifford Wilson And Sons Inc | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $900,320 |
36 | J Powers LLC | Marshall, MI 49068 | $879,081 |
37 | Patrick M Carmickle | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $838,250 |
38 | Nearnberg Farms | Albion, MI 49224 | $827,571 |
39 | Frank Sutfin | Climax, MI 49034 | $823,742 |
40 | Irons Farms LLC | Athens, MI 49011 | $814,837 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”