Total Commodity Programs in Cass County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,578
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cass County, Michigan totaled $121,729,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth Bishop Jr | Elkhart, IN 46514 | $668,808 |
42 | Raymond R Mckenzie | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $662,739 |
43 | Davis Pork LLC | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $634,271 |
44 | Brian Keith Mckenzie | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $621,840 |
45 | Robert Dan Brossman | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $609,394 |
46 | Kenneth Cloud | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $606,566 |
47 | Joseph E Young Jr | Jones, MI 49061 | $597,293 |
48 | Terryl C Rockwell | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $591,225 |
49 | Gregory Tidey | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $581,315 |
50 | Dondee Farms Inc | Union, MI 49130 | $577,920 |
51 | Wooden Brothers Crop Farm | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $571,322 |
52 | Seldom Rest Enterprises | Niles, MI 49120 | $567,500 |
53 | Robert Guse | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $567,289 |
54 | Robert William King | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $562,881 |
55 | Roger Stamp | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $562,038 |
56 | Lois Stamp | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $561,117 |
57 | Gary Lee King | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $551,979 |
58 | Navajo Mesa Farms LLC | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $550,825 |
59 | Manning Farms | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $533,263 |
60 | Jacob Smith | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $525,860 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”