Farm Subsidy information
Cass County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Cass County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 453
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cass County, Michigan totaled $20,195,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rolling Meadows Farms LLC | Jones, MI 49061 | $1,392,049 |
2 | Berrybrook Enterprises | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $1,317,100 |
3 | Reed Family Farms LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $1,124,424 |
4 | Maplewood Farms LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $1,019,586 |
5 | Davis Farms LLC | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $859,769 |
6 | Scott D Mckenzie | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $599,846 |
7 | Navajo Mesa Farms LLC | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $550,825 |
8 | Dentler Farms LLC | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $549,879 |
9 | John Boynton | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $487,235 |
10 | Davis Pork LLC | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $484,753 |
11 | Gary Bartley | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $416,888 |
12 | Kirkdorfer Farms Inc | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $343,647 |
13 | High Quality Farms Partnership | Decatur, MI 49045 | $333,652 |
14 | Overtime Farms LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $286,146 |
15 | Jim D Milliken | Niles, MI 49120 | $285,267 |
16 | Mckenzie Highlands LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $263,056 |
17 | Pace Family Farms | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $257,638 |
18 | Walther Agribusiness Inc. | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $250,000 |
19 | Jacob Smith | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $215,890 |
20 | Sparks Cedarlee Farm LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $207,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>