Farm Subsidy information
Cass County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Cass County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 453
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cass County, Michigan totaled $20,195,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Coles Farms Inc | Niles, MI 49120 | $207,376 |
22 | Tomato Express LLC | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $206,495 |
23 | Walther Farms LLC | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $165,775 |
24 | P Four Farms LLC | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $160,792 |
25 | Peterson Ag Enterprises LLC | Niles, MI 49120 | $147,411 |
26 | Central Produce Sales Inc | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $144,195 |
27 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $143,916 |
28 | Cea Land Holdings LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $142,155 |
29 | Maple Grove Farm LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $140,816 |
30 | Seldom Rest Agri Enterprises LLC | Niles, MI 49120 | $139,238 |
31 | Grabemeyer Farms | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $139,029 |
32 | J D Layman Farms Inc | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $135,145 |
33 | Brookside Farm LLC | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $120,075 |
34 | Curt Carroll Johnson | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $115,740 |
35 | Jeffrey Lynn Tolbert | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $115,218 |
36 | C&d Mendenhall LLC | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $113,620 |
37 | Poehlman Farms | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $110,526 |
38 | Willis Lee Norton | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $100,892 |
39 | Daryl J Griner | Jones, MI 49061 | $99,437 |
40 | Barnett Farms LLC | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $97,324 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”