Farm Subsidy information
Cass County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Cass County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 342
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cass County, Michigan totaled $6,004,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Berrybrook Enterprises | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $353,613 |
2 | J D Layman Farms Inc | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $257,522 |
3 | Pace Family Farms | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $223,752 |
4 | Sparks Cedarlee Farm LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $116,582 |
5 | High Quality Farms Partnership | Decatur, MI 49045 | $116,450 |
6 | Nick Totzke Farms Llp | Stevensville, MI 49127 | $97,534 |
7 | Kirkdorfer Farms Inc | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $96,477 |
8 | Grabemeyer Farms | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $92,037 |
9 | Jacob Smith | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $79,112 |
10 | Rolling Meadows Farms LLC | Jones, MI 49061 | $68,565 |
11 | Mckenzie Highlands LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $67,106 |
12 | Gary Bartley | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $65,149 |
13 | Central Produce Sales Inc | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $64,423 |
14 | Jim D Milliken | Niles, MI 49120 | $62,628 |
15 | Curt Carroll Johnson | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $59,354 |
16 | C&d Mendenhall LLC | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $53,291 |
17 | Northrop Logging Inc | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $52,875 |
18 | Maple Grove Farm LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $51,700 |
19 | Seldom Rest Agri Enterprises LLC | Niles, MI 49120 | $51,194 |
20 | Willis Lee Norton | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $48,214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>