Total Commodity Programs in Cass County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 397
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cass County, Michigan totaled $17,057,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tomato Express LLC | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $206,495 |
22 | Walther Farms LLC | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $165,775 |
23 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $143,916 |
24 | Cea Land Holdings LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $142,155 |
25 | Grabemeyer Farms | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $137,726 |
26 | Seldom Rest Agri Enterprises LLC | Niles, MI 49120 | $132,540 |
27 | Peterson Ag Enterprises LLC | Niles, MI 49120 | $129,943 |
28 | C&d Mendenhall LLC | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $113,620 |
29 | Central Produce Sales Inc | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $109,116 |
30 | Poehlman Farms | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $107,945 |
31 | Brookside Farm LLC | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $105,211 |
32 | Coles Farms Inc | Niles, MI 49120 | $91,368 |
33 | Maple Grove Farm LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $90,582 |
34 | Curt Carroll Johnson | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $83,682 |
35 | Jeffrey Lynn Tolbert | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $82,134 |
36 | Gary Lee King | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $80,557 |
37 | Robert William King | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $80,031 |
38 | Willis Lee Norton | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $80,027 |
39 | Gregory Tidey | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $79,718 |
40 | Ronald Lynn Weston | Constantine, MI 49042 | $79,057 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”