Farm Subsidy information
Chippewa County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Chippewa County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 602
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chippewa County, Michigan totaled $16,947,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stanley G Bowerman | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $64,623 |
62 | Randall O Turner | Lansing, MI 48906 | $61,321 |
63 | Michael Allen Kowalski | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $60,765 |
64 | Jason W Hoornstra | Brimley, MI 49715 | $60,683 |
65 | Lyle Stahl | Sault S Marie, MI 49783 | $55,734 |
66 | Rogers Beef Farms | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $54,563 |
67 | Gage Family Farm Inc | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $53,359 |
68 | Davis Excavating And Logging LLC | Hulbert, MI 49748 | $52,875 |
69 | Greg Mills Trucking | Eckerman, MI 49728 | $52,875 |
70 | Cutting Edge Forest Products LLC | Eckerman, MI 49728 | $52,875 |
71 | Glen A Cryderman | Pickford, MI 49774 | $52,160 |
72 | Brian C Scales | Barbeau, MI 49710 | $50,843 |
73 | Larry Clark | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $50,193 |
74 | Daniel R Bonnee | Dafter, MI 49724 | $47,772 |
75 | Rodney Carr | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $47,072 |
76 | Kenneth W Ross | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $46,969 |
77 | Wayne R Mcguire Jr | Brimley, MI 49715 | $46,577 |
78 | Andrew J Green | Garden, MI 49835 | $46,189 |
79 | Melvin Vanluven | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $46,098 |
80 | Theodore Walsh | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $43,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”