Conservation Reserve Program in Chippewa County, Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 62
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chippewa County, Michigan totaled $77,691 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Renee Hillock | Dafter, MI 49724 | $1,150 |
22 | Rosalinda A Macdowell | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $1,088 |
23 | Dale R Macdowell Jr | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $1,088 |
24 | Billi Jo Mcguire | Brimley, MI 49715 | $1,057 |
25 | Darwin Stahl | Dafter, MI 49724 | $1,023 |
26 | Anthony W Bergstrom | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $835 |
27 | Bradley Ormsbee | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $724 |
28 | Theresa L Hill | Brimley, MI 49715 | $723 |
29 | Alan Raynard | Pickford, MI 49774 | $674 |
30 | Karen E Raynard | Pickford, MI 49774 | $674 |
31 | Orville Kabat | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $658 |
32 | Stan Shunk | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $613 |
33 | Susan A Shunk | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $575 |
34 | Melvin G Thorne | Pickford, MI 49774 | $540 |
35 | Catherine Thorne | Pickford, MI 49774 | $540 |
36 | Lindsey Sherlund | Dafter, MI 49724 | $537 |
37 | Michael Sherlund | Dafter, MI 49724 | $537 |
38 | Wayne Donaway | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $513 |
39 | Campbells Burntland Farms | Pickford, MI 49774 | $478 |
40 | Wayne Mcguire Sr | Dafter, MI 49724 | $476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”