Farm Subsidy information
Clinton County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Clinton County, Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 184
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clinton County, Michigan totaled $8,676,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brian F Koenigsknecht | Fowler, MI 48835 | $81,435 |
22 | Wieber Dairy LLC | Fowler, MI 48835 | $71,905 |
23 | Kent J Thelen | Fowler, MI 48835 | $66,949 |
24 | Britney Thelen | Fowler, MI 48835 | $66,949 |
25 | Clair Joseph Armbrustmacher | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $58,564 |
26 | Terri Jo Hawbaker | Pewamo, MI 48873 | $39,765 |
27 | Andrew J Feldpausch | Fowler, MI 48835 | $33,365 |
28 | Zachary W Wagner | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $30,480 |
29 | Oak View West LLC | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $26,948 |
30 | Fedewa Dairy LLC | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $22,938 |
31 | Michael L Fabus Sr | Elsie, MI 48831 | $16,771 |
32 | Kenneth L Wyrick | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $16,432 |
33 | Ronald Lee Arthur | Laingsburg, MI 48848 | $16,174 |
34 | Robin R Fabus | Elsie, MI 48831 | $16,154 |
35 | Christina Huhn | Eagle, MI 48822 | $16,067 |
36 | Ph Farms LLC | Eagle, MI 48822 | $15,799 |
37 | Hong Trebesh | Okemos, MI 48864 | $13,620 |
38 | Stanley G Jablowski | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $10,790 |
39 | John David Schulz | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $10,032 |
40 | Kyle L Graham | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $9,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”