Direct Payment Program in Clinton County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,111
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Clinton County, Michigan totaled $29,699,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David M Rademacher | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $162,059 |
42 | Nobis Dairy Farms | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $160,658 |
43 | Roger L Lerg | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $159,937 |
44 | Cayle Reha | Elsie, MI 48831 | $157,592 |
45 | Robert James Keilen | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $154,683 |
46 | Seyfried Farms | Dewitt, MI 48820 | $153,436 |
47 | Steenblik Dairy Inc | Pewamo, MI 48873 | $151,652 |
48 | Michael J Bertram | Fowler, MI 48835 | $144,955 |
49 | Diversified Farms LLC | Eagle, MI 48822 | $142,484 |
50 | Sanborn & Sons LLC | Hubbardston, MI 48845 | $141,245 |
51 | James B Schumaker | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $141,088 |
52 | Mr Eric Lee Voisinet | Laingsburg, MI 48848 | $138,444 |
53 | Douglas W Brya | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $134,161 |
54 | Gayle A Fitzpatrick | Fowler, MI 48835 | $129,441 |
55 | Donald Sisung | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $127,115 |
56 | Piggott Farms | Fowler, MI 48835 | $126,593 |
57 | Alan Gove | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $124,726 |
58 | Dale Lynn Devereaux | Ovid, MI 48866 | $124,534 |
59 | Matthew Peck | Elsie, MI 48831 | $122,390 |
60 | Douglas P Eldridge | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $121,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”