Counter Cyclical Program in Clinton County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 783
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Clinton County, Michigan totaled $4,076,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jack Anderson | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $15,580 |
62 | Wesley G Swanson | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $15,499 |
63 | David M Rademacher | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $15,415 |
64 | Theodore L Ashley | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $15,124 |
65 | James W Kolp | Grand Blanc, MI 48439 | $14,916 |
66 | Russell Braun | Ovid, MI 48866 | $14,169 |
67 | Ronald Lee Arthur | Laingsburg, MI 48848 | $14,030 |
68 | Todd David Olson | Dewitt, MI 48820 | $13,969 |
69 | Houska Farms Inc | Elsie, MI 48831 | $13,852 |
70 | Thelen Dairy Inc | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $13,756 |
71 | Piggott Farms | Fowler, MI 48835 | $13,544 |
72 | Jerome B Pohl | Fowler, MI 48835 | $13,479 |
73 | Michael J Bertram | Fowler, MI 48835 | $13,454 |
74 | Donald Stump | Pewamo, MI 48873 | $13,134 |
75 | James B Schumaker | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $13,022 |
76 | William Leonard Armbrustmacher | Fowler, MI 48835 | $13,020 |
77 | Clair Joseph Armbrustmacher | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $13,020 |
78 | Dennis Farms LLC | Laingsburg, MI 48848 | $13,000 |
79 | Kyle Dean Barnhart | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $12,819 |
80 | Wieber Farm | Fowler, MI 48835 | $12,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”