Total Commodity Programs in Clinton County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,947
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clinton County, Michigan totaled $172,188,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James Blair Kelley | Ovid, MI 48866 | $893,326 |
42 | Clair Joseph Armbrustmacher | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $884,982 |
43 | Leroy E Schafer | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $877,484 |
44 | Ronald Lee Arthur | Laingsburg, MI 48848 | $863,065 |
45 | Robert James Boettger | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $835,194 |
46 | Kenneth L Wyrick | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $830,595 |
47 | Houska Farms Inc | Elsie, MI 48831 | $822,044 |
48 | Scott E Havens | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $815,915 |
49 | Maple Glaze Dairy LLC | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $814,327 |
50 | Mr Eric Lee Voisinet | Laingsburg, MI 48848 | $804,409 |
51 | Shady Lodge Farm | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $800,032 |
52 | Jon M Thelen | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $797,986 |
53 | Evergreen Dairy Farm, LLC | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $777,697 |
54 | Motz View Farms LLC | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $771,592 |
55 | D & M Schrader Dairy LLC | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $747,724 |
56 | Pline Farms | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $743,317 |
57 | Monique H Hicks | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $734,416 |
58 | Kevin Bailey | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $734,322 |
59 | Earl T Barks Sr | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $717,723 |
60 | Brett M Stump | Fowler, MI 48835 | $717,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”